Any reason behind this? It's literally ****ing useless.
Check my fuel log, updated my last three with readout mileage.
Printable View
Any reason behind this? It's literally ****ing useless.
Check my fuel log, updated my last three with readout mileage.
I'm comparing the trip computer to actual consumption?
Have you compared the odometer to what a GPS indicates?
Is the Micra connecting to a GPS somehow?
Would the Micra not use the same information to give me odometer readings as it does my fuel economy?
I expect that it does, but I'm just looking for anything that might account for such a large discrepancy. I own a 2014 CUBE, and a 2018 NOTE and both of their readouts are off, but not by that much.
I put slightly larger tyres on the CUBE (65R instead of 60R) and the calculated mileage went down slightly. In reality the consumption improved when I considered the actual distance covered.
I don't blame you for despising the economy; you sure put a lot of miles on it.
Resetting odo on each fill up, and filling to the first click on each tank. I can squeeze an extra 1.5l in if I go for the second click, but I avoid doing so. Not that that should affect readings long term by more than a quarter litre high and low/100km.
Just FYI, I compared the onboard display vs. actual consumption of a Micra S loaner from Nissan.
After going 838 km from the previous fill (to the top), it said 4.4 L/100 km. Actual consumption for that fill was 4.8, so it was optimistic by 8%. The ScanGauge read 4.5, or 6% optimistic (which can be calibrated, but wasn't yet). Context for those results.
838 from a micra... teach me Obi Wan...